angrywhitefemale.wordpress.com

I am not sure if anyone is still reading or subscribed to this blog but, if so, I am starting a new one at http://angrywhitefemale.wordpress.com/ Please update any bookmarks accordingly.

I may use this site as a backup for new posts, but I am not sure if I will right now. I really do not like the way Google is compiling "profiles" of users and linking all your information together.

Quality or Quantity?

There seems to be a trend to "soften up" both politics and racialism in order to win over more people. This is most obvious in things like Bush's "compassionate conservatism" and the replacement of the old right "paleoconservatives" with the neo-Cons of today [what would've been called liberals, or worse, only a generation ago]. I guess some "leaders" still think that if they make the message warm and fuzzy enough, that they will win the hearts and minds of the majority. This will not work, because the majority has been brainwashed into having an almost pathological reaction against anything seen as racist, anti-Semitic, or intolerant. We may be able to reach the more intelligent of these people with logical and rational arguments, but we cannot hope to succeed through emotionalism, and any attempt to do so will only weaken and dilute our own position and make us more susceptible to infiltration by those who would destroy us.

The so-called values, beliefs, and morals of the American people are nothing more than what the media tells them and what they think the popular or socially accepted belief is. Unless we can somehow gain control of all the major media within the next 10 or so years, no amount of softening our image or kissing up to either the Jews, the neo-Cons, or the lemmings and their touchy-feely sensibilities is going to do any good. History is not made by compromise and surrender, but by those willing to fight for what is right and hold fast to their principles. The only way to get the majority of Americans to support us is for things to get bad enough for them to be forced out of their comfort zones. Then, and only then, they may realize that the current government and it's multicultural policies will not take care of them. It won't be a matter of hearts and minds, for the most part, if they do follow us, it will only occur if we appear to have the strength and resources to support them (ie, to take control) once the current system falls. This situation will probably not arise without a physical struggle.

I do not to see my friends and family fighting, and probably dying, in any sort of war, but I realize that one is probably coming. I do not know if it will be in terms of race, class, or simply freedom-loving Americans who have had enough fighting back against their oppressors, but the current system cannot sustain itself for long, and the only "peaceful" solution I see is for us to lie down and die off quietly. If that is it the case, I'd rather be prepared to fight back, and I want to know that my "comrades" are also prepared to fight, not to compromise and surrender because they have been prepared to find "common ground" with our enemies. Let them try to wipe out the pure whites if they will, but I'll be damned if I'll help promote it among those who are supposed to be saving our race.

I would love to see a huge White Nationalist movement in this country, and worldwide, but we must not sacrifice quality for quantity. The people I see getting involved with the movement, and actually sticking around and being productive, see the threat from nonwhites and want to join a group that is willing to resist it, not one that will compromise and try to get along with our racial enemies. The mainstream conservative-type groups have destroyed themselves by softening their positions, and we racialists cannot afford to do the same. The Jews, mestizos, and blacks cannot be trusted in any offer of peace or friendship, because nothing is ever good enough. At best, they will use it to gain our trust and then attack from within, as they are already doing through those who sympathize with them and yet claim to support the interests of the white race.

We're losing numbers too quickly to worry about doing things slowly and easily or bringing people in gradually. These will come to us when the situation gets bad enough that they need protection, or when they think we have the upper hand. For now, we need the people who are serious and willing to fight, and these will not be scared away by labels of "racist" and "anti-Semite" or by accusations of "hate" or "extremism". We worry so much about being portrayed as a bunch of fanatics that we are alienating the people we need the most. If your website or group wants to run off the "name the Jew freaks" or the "militant fringe", feel free to send them my way. I'd much rather stand with 10 "fanatics" than 100 fence sitters who who are terrified to say the word "Jew" and have to whisper and look around the room before whispering anything about their "dark-skinned neighbors".

Ammo & Reloading Supplies Threatened By New OSHA Regulations!

http://www.nssf.org/news/PR_idx.cfm?PRloc=common/PR/&PR=BP070207.cfm

OSHA is proposing new rules that would seriously regulate, and in many cases eliminate, the sale of black & smokeless powder, primers, and ammunition to retailers and individuals. They are doing this by defining ammunition and certain reloading components [powder & primers] as explosives, and placing them under the same regulations as dynamite and industrial explosives. Basically, it's a way of using "safety" regulations to make shooting and reloading supplies harder to get, and possibly to discourage retailers from carrying them, and to make it even harder for small gun shops and sporting suppliers to stay within the law.

Here are a few relevant sections, the comments in italics are mine:

Explosive. This term would be defined to mean any device, or liquid
or solid chemical compound or mixture, the primary or common purpose of
which is to function by explosion. The term ....explosive'' would be
defined to include all material included as a Class 1 explosive by DOT
in accordance with 49 CFR chapter I. The term would include, but would
not be limited to, dynamite, black powder, pellet powders, detonators, blasting agents, initiating explosives, blasting caps, safety fuse,
fuse lighters, fuse igniters, squibs, cordeau detonant fuse,
instantaneous fuse, igniter cord, igniters, pyrotechnics, special
industrial explosive materials, small arms ammunition, small arms
ammunition primers, smokeless propellant, cartridges for propellant-
actuated power devices, and cartridges for industrial guns.

This means any store selling any of the above is subject to other regulations of the rules, including:
-only employing people trained in handling explosives [even for loading/unloading stock]
-mandatory drug testing [even allowing a person under the influence into the shop could be a violation]
-no flammable cleaning solvents allowed on premises [Aren't Hoppes, etc considered flammable solvents?]
-there must be a remote disconnect for the electrical supply to any area containing "explosives"
-would require evacuation in the case of lightning or electrical storms
-would prohibit matches & lighters within 50 feet of "explosives" [Are they supposed to search customers now?]

Issue #4: OSHA seeks specific comments on the impact proposed
paragraph (c)(3)(iii) would have on the storage and retail sale of
small arms ammunition, small arms primers, and smokeless propellants.
Do open flames, matches, or spark producing devices create a hazard
when located within 50 feet of small arms ammunition, small arms
primers, or smokeless propellants, or facilities containing these
products? Can employers involved in the storage or retail sale of small
arms ammunition, small arms primers, or smokeless propellants prevent
all open flames, matches, or spark producing devices from coming within
50 feet of these products or facilities containing these products? If
not, why not? Should proposed paragraph (c)(3)(iii) use a protective
distance other than 50 feet and, if so, what distance should it be and
why? Should OSHA exclude small arms ammunition, small arms primers, and
smokeless propellants from the requirements of proposed paragraph
(c)(3)(iii)?

Proposed paragraph (c)(3)(iii)(C) would require the employer to
ensure that no person carries firearms, ammunition, or similar articles
in facilities containing explosives.
[This includes gun shops - around here armed employees and legal armed customers are the norm. Are are they going to take the further and try to say you can't sell ammunition within so many feet of a firearm? That should shut a lot of places down.]

Proposed paragraph (e)(1) addresses general provisions associated
with the transportation of explosives. Proposed paragraph (e)(1)(i)
would require the employer to ensure that no employee smokes, carries
matches or any other flame-producing device, or carries any firearms or
cartridges (except firearms and cartridges required to be carried by
guards) while in, or within 25 feet (7.63m) of, a vehicle containing
explosives.

Paragraph (e)(1)(iii) would require the employer to ensure that
explosives are not transferred from one vehicle to another without
informing local fire and police departments. This will help to ensure
that the transfer is performed in a safe manner. In addition, a
competent person must supervise the transfer of explosives. This is
applicable to all transfer work whether it is done within private
facilities or on public highways.
[That should pretty much shut down mail order suppliers, or shipping by UPS, etc.]

Proposed paragraph (h)(2) would require the employer to ensure that
small arms ammunition is separated from flammable liquids, flammable
solids, and oxidizing materials by a fire barrier wall with at least a
1-hour fire resistance rating or by a distance of at least 25 feet.
Paragraph (h)(4)(i)(B) would require the employer to ensure that
small arms ammunition primers be separated from flammable liquids,
flammable solids, and oxidizing materials by a fire barrier wall with
at least a 1-hour fire resistance rating or by a distance of at least
25 feet.
[Again, this will be impossible for many small gun shops, and probably too much of a hassle for major retailers to want to deal with.]

Paragraph (h)(3)(i)(B) would require the employer to ensure that no
more than 20 pounds of smokeless propellants, in containers not to
exceed 1 pound, are displayed in a commercial establishment.
Paragraph (h)(4)(i)(C) would require the employer to ensure that no
more than 10,000 small arms primers be displayed in a commercial
establishment.
[That's not much at all for a store inventory, especially with the added requirements for restocking when the 20 pounds of smokeless powder [less than 3 8 pound containers] or 10,000 primers [10 boxes] have been sold. A lot of people keep more than that in their garage.]

Issue #21: Proposed paragraphs (h)(3)(i)(B) and (h)(4)(i)(C) place
restrictions on the quantity of smokeless propellants and small arms
primers, respectively, that can be displayed in commercial
establishments. Should OSHA further clarify the quantity limitations
for smokeless propellants and small arms primers to allow multiple
displays in commercial establishments? If so, what quantities should be
allowed and should the quantities be based on the size of the
commercial establishment? Should there be a minimum distance between
displays to ensure employee safety? Should the same limitations placed
on commercial establishments also apply to gun shows?
[Since the new requirements will be impossible for many small businesses to meet, OSHA is already looking ahead to how much they can regulate gun shows, to be sure to keep "dangerous explosives" like ammunition and reloading supplies out of people's hands.]

Paragraph (j) Training. Proposed paragraph (j) is new and contains
proposed training requirements for employees in the explosives
industry.
[I'd assume people in the explosives industry would be trained already, if they wanted to keep all their fingers, but OSHA thinks it's necessary to extend this training right down to the kid who stocks the sporting goods section at Wal-Mart, since he is handling and unloading explosives under these new definitions].


*To send comments to OSHA*, and for the full text of the proposal, go to:
http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main
Go to the Option 4 drop down menu and select "Document ID"
Key this ID in to the action box ... OSHA-2007-0032
Click on the SUBMIT button
[or, I can send it in a .pdf file to anyone who wants it]

Please forward this to anyone you know who this may affect, especially to any business owners whose comments may have more pull with OSHA in this matter [gun shops, pawn shops, sporting goods, surplus, mail order, etc].

David Lane - RIP

David Lane passed away on May 28, at the Federal Prison in Terra Haute, Indiana. While I have publicly disagreed with some of his later writing and ideas, I still maintained a great respect for Mr. Lane, and enjoyed corresponding with him, because of the ways our viewpoints seemed to diverge and converge. If nothing else, he gave his all for what he believed in, and never bowed to defeat or bribery - he kept on being a thorn in their side until the end.

For those of you who know nothing of David Lane, or the Order, here are some links for a quick education:
David Lane's Pyramid Prophecy Website
Wikipedia - David Lane
Wikipedia - The Order
Free The Order

And here is the text of David Lane's final address to the jury, which says it all:

From the era of Plato, Socrates, and Cato to that of DaVinci and Michelangelo, to Locke and Shakespeare, to Jefferson and Franklin, Western civilization has sprung from the creative genius of one kindred people. In the vast panorama of time this period was but a fleeting moment and a glorious dream. The near future will show what manner of civilization will follow the passing of the White man. How sad and ironic that the American republic, which was formed exclusively for the preservation and promotion of Western man, became the vehicle through which he was destroyed both here and in his European homeland.

For many years I have struggled in whatever ways were available to a single powerless person to crack the iron media curtain and show my people that those very things which are protected, promoted, and forced upon us by those who today control the affairs of the Western world have destroyed every civilization we have ever built. I refer to such things as infanticide through abortion, a practice which has led to the murder of fifteen million babies of my kith and kin, and which is protected by the government and the Federal courts; homosexuality, whose adherents are forced upon us as role models and even teachers of our children by the government and Federal courts; and worst of all, the deliberate destruction of our very racial existence.

Those who have set out to mix and destroy the last remnant of Western man know full well that no people can continue in existence without a nation of their own in which to propagate, protect, and promote their own kind. They also know that a people who are not convinced of their own uniqueness and value will perish, and that is why I am slandered and destroyed when I show that nearly every improvement in the human condition has come from the fertile mind of Western man.

The White man is now a tiny minority in the world, yet he is denied not only a nation of his own but the integrity of the territorial imperative necessary to his survival. The guilt of those who partake in the destruction of this Race of men cannot be adequately described in the vocabulary of mortals. Regarding the prosecutors in this case, I say only that if the perpetuation of power is predicated on perjury, then the U. S. Attorneys are as solid as the Rock of Gibraltar. But if nature's laws allow for the concepts of justice or karmic debt, then they walk on quicksand.

That this trial even occurred is a violation of every Constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The legalistic machinations and chicanery involved in jeopardizing a man for potentially unlimited times for the same offense, by changing the legal description of that offense, by changing jurisdictions and so on are utterly repugnant to the sense of Anglo-Saxon justice as well as totally contrary both to the spirit and the intent of the Constitution. The mad frenzy of those who now control the Federal government of the United States to punish and destroy any White man who resists the deliberate admixture and murder of his rapidly disappearing Race is evident.

History predicts unspeakable horror for the last generation of White children, if I and others who shall come after me are not more successful in awakening our people from their sleep of death. Our task is as simple as it is overwhelmingly important: WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTENCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR WHITE CHILDREN. In the face of that overriding historical imperative, what you do to me does not matter. I am not a brave man; I die the thousand deaths of the philosopher instead of the single death of the soldier. But I willingly sought this destiny, and I will not shrink from it.

Soon you will hear from another who will undoubtedly speak of his religious beliefs. Perhaps even at this late date, the power of a religious creed can save Western man, or perhaps Divine Providence will indeed lend a hand. If not, then those who rebel against tyranny must still accept the consequences with a shrug, or they are neither patriots nor men.

I say no more....

I Have Returned

I wasn't going to go through the hassle of switching this account over to one through Google, because I hadn't posted very often. Then, I noticed that the hit counter was still going up, and I am getting several visits a week from Stormfront, just of my signature link, so I decided it might be worth it, so I'm brinnging the blog back. I pared down a lot of the "fluff" and personal stuff, because I have other places for that, and will be trying to keep the focus on political, cultural, and survival issues from now on.